I’m utterly inspired by Appolition and apps like it. We should have a compassionate society and infrastructure that allows everyone a real chance. But we don’t, so if there are ways to take matters into our own hands (while pressuring government), so be it.
·
Replies
·
Share this post
Genuine, voluntary distribution of wealth from those with the ability to those according to their need. My view is that this is a simplified (likely oversimplified) version of what governments need to be doing to support those in need, but here we are. Needs must.
·
Replies
·
Share this post
There would be no questions asked about what the money would be used for. If you need it and you qualify, it’s yours. The central account would distribute to neighborhood ATMs according to the local need, with contributions drawn from everywhere.
·
Replies
·
Share this post
Withdrawal cards would be distributed by local aid organizations and linked to a specific neighborhood ATM. (Not a bank ATM: a separate machine.) The monthly withdrawal limit would be set according to circumstance according to a rubric; eg, a parent with kids would need more.
·
Replies
·
Share this post
Privacy legislation is important but can’t guarantee privacy - just punitive measures for anyone who’s caught. Instead, bake it into the protocols. Make it mandatory. Human values need to be baked into the way the Internet works.
·
Replies
·
Share this post
Hearken has shown that treating your community as coreporters is highly valuable both for newsrooms and readers. Social media has given everyone a voice. What if you redesigned content management to take that into account from the ground up? Not a CMS; not a forum. Something new.
·
Replies
·
Share this post
Comments are horrible as a community platform. Slack as a side community has worked fairly well for sites like The Information. But I bet something much better is possible, that allows publishers to really leverage their community and gives readers more value.
·
Replies
·
Share this post
I 100% agree with the idea that vast wealth - being rich - should be socially unacceptable.
·
Replies
·
Share this post
Of course, these donut heads would never build better infrastructure or consider creating anything that actually helped real people live.
·
Replies
·
Share this post
The vision for the web is a place without benevolent supercorps. Tim Berners-Lee said it best: “this is for everyone”. It’s all of ours.
·
Replies
·
Share this post
The problem with self-contained network silos is that a single entity dictates what can be said, seen & heard. Benevolent supercorps again.
·
Replies
·
Share this post
The problem with the native app ecosystem is app stores: an entity on each platform dictating what’s acceptable. Benevolent supercorps.
·
Replies
·
Share this post
So it’s kind of a shame that the word “liberty” is mostly used by people who want to ride roughshod over everybody else.
·
Replies
·
Share this post
The world needs more humanist technologists and fewer technical determinists.
·
Replies
·
Share this post
@francesbell Decentralized data is core to this! But again: what can we do better with decentralized data than centralized? Privacy for sure
·
Replies
·
Share this post
Core question: what can decentralized software do better than centralized, leaving aside ideology? My bet is on business use cases to start.
·
Replies
·
Share this post
The problem is pressing. In a world where authoritarianism is on the rise, ethical software shouldn't track users in an identifying way.
·
Replies
·
Share this post
Decentralization is not a value proposition, unfortunately. It's important to build great products that happen to be decentralized.
·
Replies
·
Share this post
While "let's not build products that could undermine democratic society" sounds like a human problem, most users don't see the need in time.
·
Replies
·
Share this post
It's not enough to build a product with a democratic ideology. You have to do the hard work of making sure you're solving a human problem.
·
Replies
·
Share this post
Where decentralization communities failed was on desirability of their offerings to ordinary people. Projects were too academic / nerdy.
·
Replies
·
Share this post
We now know that targeted advertising was used to attempt to swing a federal election, and that the administration wanted a mole inside Fb.
·
Replies
·
Share this post
During the sourcing for Matter Seven, I used a veto vote several times because of founder sexism or racism. Made me sad every time.
·
Replies
·
Share this post
TV needs to be a separate, first-class device, capable of playing content on its own. The friction of phone or laptop as controller is high.
·
Replies
·
Share this post
Werd I/O © Ben Werdmuller. The text (without images) of this site is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.